[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: mutt config hosed?

To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: mutt config hosed?
From: Marc Espie <Marc.Espie@liafa.jussieu.fr>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 12:29:27 +0200
Mail-Followup-To: misc@openbsd.org
References: <200009010428.e814SMN26255@wormhole.bluestar.net> <19443.967783233@hana.snafu.org>

On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 09:40:33PM -0700, Marco S Hyman wrote:

> That's so hard?  If you don't want to update your whole tree
> cd to /usr/ports/mail/mutt and then issue the cvs command.

Bad advice. It MAY work, but you had better know quite well what you are
doing, so I wouldn't recommend that to a relative newbie. Current policy is 
to recommend wholesale update of the whole ports tree.

Even though bsd.port.mk has some failsafe, it probably won't catch 
everything...
-- 
	Marc Espie		
|anime, sf, juggling, unicycle, acrobatics, comics...
|AmigaOS, OpenBSD, C++, perl, Icon, PostScript...
| `real programmers don't die, they just get out of beta'

References:
- Re: mutt config hosed?
  - From: "James Moore" <jim.moore@firelinedsl.com>
- Re: mutt config hosed?
  - From: Marco S Hyman <marc@snafu.org>

Prev by Date: dump_entry.c:38: termsort.c: No such file or directory
Next by Date: Re: mutt config hosed?
Prev by thread: Re: mutt config hosed?
Next by thread: Re: mutt config hosed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread