[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mac hardware?
Speaking of OpenBSD and MacOSX, has the only-static-compile problem been
solved for gnustep on OpenBSD? I looked into this a few months (6-9) back
with OBSD 2.6 and could not find a way to use shared libraries. At the time
NetBSD had the same problem, but a quick look at the gnustep webpage
(http://www.gnustep.org) shows that NetBSD now links dynamically when using
elf. Gnustep is coming along nicely, and would be a great way to both have
your cake and eat it too --- OpenBSD and the MacOSX API's (or very close to
them).
- Steve
At 12:29 PM 9/14/00 -0600, PC Drew wrote:
>See below...
>
>--
>PC Drew
>
>"To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion."
>
>On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Matthew C. Weigel wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, PC Drew wrote:
> >
> > > another "supported" question. What about the new Mac hardware? I'm
> >
> > http://www.openbsd.org/powerpc.html
> > Fine manuals they are indeed :)
>
>And now I've RTFM. :)
>
> >
> > To ask a loaded question, why don't you go with MacOS X? While it's
> not yet
> > ready for a production system (it being a Beta and all) I *have* been
> > hearing good things about it. And it shares code with FreeBSD and NetBSD,
> > so you wouldn't be falling too far from the BSD tree :)
>
>Actually, I'm really excited about OS X, but I really want to
>get into OpenBSD. I've been monitoring the OpenBSD webpage for
>a couple of years now, looking at each of the new releases and
>waiting for the best time to jump into OpenBSD.
>
>I made that jump a few weeks ago and I'm really happy with my decision.
>I think that the OpenBSD developers have been doing a kick ass job
>and I'm impressed. So, back to the main topic. Why don't I just
>plan on using OS X when it comes out? Well, because I want to use
>OpenBSD instead. Now, if I could use Mac On Linux with OpenBSD, then
>I could have the best of both worlds, now couldn't I? :)