RE: Redundant ipf bridging

["Marco Brigham" <marco.brigham@advalvas.be>]

> 802.1D spanning tree was added in December to the bridge, so it's a
> relatively new addition (available in the snapshots and -current).
> (btw, I'd like to hear some comments on it, like "[does/doesn't] work
> for me.") It should work just fine in conjuction with another bridge to
> provide failover as long as you don't use stateful ipf rules.

So not using stateful rules would provide a transparent transition between
bridges. I'm more inclined to accept loosing established connections in the
failover event, than loosing stateful inspection...that's the issue at hand
right?