[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why isn't . in the path? (Was: nmbd problems...)

To: Claus <cniesen@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: Why isn't . in the path? (Was: nmbd problems...)
From: Artur Grabowski <art@blahonga.org>
Date: 26 Jan 2001 06:59:07 +0100
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
References: <BFEFJAMBJELJLANOMNFLGEAKCAAA.faustus@telusplanet.net><5.0.1.4.2.20010125164828.00a49540@pop.gmx.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7

Claus <cniesen@gmx.net> writes:

> Is there a reason why . is not being included in the path?

Because there is no reason for it to be there.

//art

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why isn't . in the path? (Was: nmbd problems...)
  - From: Rakhesh Sasidharan <rakhesh@cse.iitd.ernet.in>

References:
- RE: nmbd problems...
  - From: "Doktor Faustus" <faustus@telusplanet.net>
- Why isn't . in the path? (Was: nmbd problems...)
  - From: Claus <cniesen@gmx.net>

Prev by Date: Re: wi0 Problems
Next by Date: Re: Adaptec trouble with v2.8 - Boot Failure
Prev by thread: Re: Why isn't . in the path? (Was: nmbd problems...)
Next by thread: Re: Why isn't . in the path? (Was: nmbd problems...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread