[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: testing raid 0

To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: testing raid 0
From: Chris Palmer <cecibean@bitstream.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 08:55:17 -0700
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0108011504370.2757-100000@router.local.medimex.ro> <012101c11a92$c05974c0$4000a8c0@interhouse.redbus.com> <20010801102234.W22280@cepheid.nu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On 01 Aug  Jeff Bachtel wrote:

> From personal experience with raidframe on OpenBSD, I'll second
> Peter's statement. While it is theoretically possible that a
> well-tuned raidframe setup (check the layout section of the raidctl
> configuration, as well as the queue) could slightly outperform normal
> disk drivers on a scsi chain, its not likely, and is even less likely
> on an IDE chain.

Why is RAIDframe slower than a single disk?


-- 
Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: testing raid 0
  - From: Jeff Bachtel <jeff@cepheid.org>
- Re: testing raid 0
  - From: "Paul M. Hirsch" <elektrosatan@voltagenoir.org>

References:
- testing raid 0
  - From: <alx2001@medimex.ro>
- Re: testing raid 0
  - From: "Peter Galbavy" <peter.galbavy@knowtion.net>
- Re: testing raid 0
  - From: Jeff Bachtel <jeff@cepheid.org>

Prev by Date: Re: function keys (F12)
Next by Date: Re: OpenBSD 2.9 and Sophos Antivirus ?
Prev by thread: Re: testing raid 0
Next by thread: Re: testing raid 0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread