Re: HTML compliancy [was: Where are wd0s1, wd0s2, wd0s3?]

[Tony Lambiris <methodic@libpcap.net>]

I as well would like participating in this. I know enough C code to get
me by, but I know HTML (as well as PHP) like the back of my hand..

Please contact me if anyone would like to work with me.

I actually wget -r'd openbsd.org a few weeks ago, and I was going to go
through all the code, spruce things up, etc.. but you know how work is..
one minute you have a ton of free time, next minute youre swamped..

On 08.07.01, Brian Poole <raj@cerias.purdue.edu> wrote:
> Quoting Todd C. Miller (Todd.Miller@courtesan.com) from  6 August 2001:
> > In message <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108061807560.1505-100000@saitti.net>
> > 	so spake Heikki Korpela (heko):
> ..
> > > BTW, there's some non-HTML-standard-conforming stuff in the
> > > www tree. Is HTML conformance a goal?
> > 
> > I certainly think it should be.
> 
> As do I, and I put forward a significant effort towards correcting the
> situation a few months back (search the archives, I was ranting all
> over). At the end it looked like Miod was going to help with getting
> some of it committed, but I believe he ended up getting a lot busier
> than he had planned (?).
> 
> I can still lend some assistance, if there is a willingness from 
> someone with commit access to commit HTML compliancy patches. I will
> also do my best to keep the tree compliant as well, after it is done, 
> but simply said, I can't do it without the patches being committed.
> 
> I just wish browsers were like compilers, they wouldn't even process
> the code if it was full of errors. We would have a lot more HTML 
> compliancy if that was the case.
> 
> 
> -b