[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ultrasparc hardware - my suggestion

To: Andrew M Hoerter <amh@POBOX.COM>
Subject: Re: Ultrasparc hardware - my suggestion
From: Jason Wright <jason@thought.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:29:29 -0400
Cc: misc@openbsd.org, sparc@openbsd.org
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <e1e49d02c1e6c3f011e688fddafaedca3b8a8971@watchguard.com> <006b01c12f2a$839beb10$1601a8c0@andrey> <20010827152018.K14082@valais.korolev.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 03:20:18PM -0400, Andrew M Hoerter wrote:
> Of course, that takes a lot more time/effort than simply searching on EBay..
> 
The goal here is to get a machine into art's hands as soon as possible
so that he can work on sparc64 more quickly.  It's very annoying to have
only one machine for builds and debugging (slows the process down
considerably).

--Jason L. Wright

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ultrasparc hardware - my suggestion
  - From: Mike Wahle <mwahle@luminate.com>

References:
- Re: Ultrasparc hardware.
  - From: Henry Pierce <hpierce@watchguard.com>
- Re: Ultrasparc hardware - my suggestion
  - From: "Andrey Smagin" <asmagin@rapidds.com>
- Re: Ultrasparc hardware - my suggestion
  - From: Andrew M Hoerter <amh@POBOX.COM>

Prev by Date: Re: Ultrasparc hardware - my suggestion
Next by Date: Re: Proposal. Register exchangable programms in basesystem as ports.
Prev by thread: Re: Ultrasparc hardware - my suggestion
Next by thread: Re: Ultrasparc hardware - my suggestion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread