[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: not GENERIC dmesg
- To: misc@openbsd.org
- Subject: Re: not GENERIC dmesg
- From: Brian Poole <raj@cerias.purdue.edu>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 11:44:39 -0500
- Content-Disposition: inline
- References: <20020530112416.A7004@devel.int.todesplanet.de> <20020530024321.A1042@argus.oxide.org>
Quoting Hugh Graham (hugh@openbsd.org) from 30 May 2002:
> affect autoconf output, I'd say your not quite GENERIC dmesg
> won't seriously degrade the log's signal to noise ratio.
Here is another dmesg question.. Is there a preferred subject for
dmesg's sent in, to allow the interested to spot the ones they
are interested in more easily? I generally throw up a little info
(processor/arch, release version, and anything slightly unusual)
in the subject, but in the interest of making it more usable I'm
curious if there is a "preferred" format of the subject.
-b