Re: not GENERIC dmesg

[Artur Grabowski <art@blahonga.org>]

Brian Poole <raj@cerias.purdue.edu> writes:

> Quoting Hugh Graham (hugh@openbsd.org) from 30 May 2002:
> 
> > affect autoconf output, I'd say your not quite GENERIC dmesg
> > won't seriously degrade the log's signal to noise ratio.
> 
> Here is another dmesg question.. Is there a preferred subject for
> dmesg's sent in, to allow the interested to spot the ones they 
> are interested in more easily? I generally throw up a little info
> (processor/arch, release version, and anything slightly unusual)
> in the subject, but in the interest of making it more usable I'm
> curious if there is a "preferred" format of the subject.

I'd say that for me no subject is best. We don't actually read those messages,
we just grep in them and having a subject that doesn't pollute the grep
results is best.

//art