Re: pf on a p90

["taproot420" <taproot420@myrealbox.com>]

Sweet, actually I forgot but a friend gave me a sun sparcStation 10 that
has 64megs of ram and two of those funky oval processors, I think they
call them hyper sparc or something, running at I believe 45 mhz. I don't
know about sun hardware but I figured a sparc 10 @ 45mhz was probably to
under powered for most uses today. I was wanting to try openbsd 3.1 on
it just to see how it does.

Thanks scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Ream [mailto:sream@9370.org] 
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 8:49 PM
To: taproot420; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: RE: pf on a p90

I ran 2.9 and ipf on a 486dx33 with 16megs of ram acting as a
natrouter/firewall for 4 machine sharing a cable modem.  IIRC speeds
were in
excess of 1mbps.  I was also running samba and apache.  Only things that
slowed it down were when I was running webmin (cgi's).

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-misc@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-misc@openbsd.org]On Behalf Of
taproot420
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5:26 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: pf on a p90


I found a p90 W/90megs of ram and was wondering if this would be enough
oomph for a pf firewall that would be responsible for connecting my home
lan to the internet via a T1 or the new 3-5meg dsl lines that are said
to be coming soon? The only other spare computer I have Is a 150mhz and
I was wanting to use it for a nfs server that is why I was looking into
the p90 to fill this need. One other thing that I need the pf firewall
to do is nat inbound (originating from the internet) ipsec connections
to my vpn server. I tried ipf before for this but was unsuccessful
nating more that one ipsec connection at a time. As for the load the pf
fw would see... I would say no more than 10 concurrent connections.

I would also appreciate if one posted the links to some of the archives
such as MR. Hollands as I would like to have more research capabilities
on openbsd.

Thanks in advance

Taproot420