Re: non-exec stack

["Brian J. Kifiak" <bk@rt.fm>]

> Also, I was wondering if the non executable stack was now an
> option (a sysctl, whatever) or if there was any way to disable it
> (if it could break some software).

I would purpose that it would be curteous to either read the code
for yourself, or wait for someone to write documentation.

(Or, optimally, read the code and write some documentation for
everyone, letting the people who code code some more if they wish.)