[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NATing gateway which somehow doesn't

To: "Stein B. Sylvarnes" <stein.sylvarnes@student.uib.no>
Subject: Re: NATing gateway which somehow doesn't
From: peter@bgnett.no (Peter N. M. Hansteen)
Date: 28 Jan 2003 10:46:15 +0100
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
References: <20030123102342.22946@bryggen.bgnett.no> <20030124050031.GA14068@loke.tilflukten.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

"Stein B. Sylvarnes" <stein.sylvarnes@student.uib.no> writes:

> > $ grep -v # /etc/pf.conf
> > scrub in all 
> > nat on xl0 from 192.168.103.0/24 to any -> 194.54.107.17
>   nat on xl0 from 192.168.103.0/24 to any -> 194.54.107.19
>                                                         ^^

yes, or even better

nat on xl0 from 192.168.103.0/24 to any -> xl0

as another poster suggested. Works wonderfully well.

-- 
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/	http://www.datadok.no/

References:
- NATing gateway which somehow doesn't
  - From: "Peter N. M. Hansteen" <peter@bryggen.bgnett.no>
- Re: NATing gateway which somehow doesn't
  - From: "Stein B. Sylvarnes" <stein.sylvarnes@student.uib.no>

Prev by Date: Re: screen buffer in -current
Next by Date: Re: Questions on IPSec - One more question this time on the encryption type
Prev by thread: Re: NATing gateway which somehow doesn't
Next by thread: Uses of the new VIA C3?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread