Re: pf(4) testing needed

[Scott Johnson <scottj@insane.com>]

I've got several extra machines sitting around here and have a bit of
time to test things our.  I'm not currently a pf user but I'm also not
a whiny newbie that will post stupid questions without a lot of
research first.

That being said, would you mind either listing the new features that
need testing or pointing me to a link where I can find such a list.  I
have read through the CVS logs, and as somebody who is not intimately
familiar with the pf source, I didn't find a lot of helpful info.  I
found one or two things that I considered new and needing testing, but
I am figuring that there's a more complete list somewhere out there.

Thanks,
Scott


At 07:59 PM 2/1/2003, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>So our packet filter development process is starting to lock before the
>3.3 release.
>
>Both 3.1 and 3.2 shipped with minor annoying bugs in the pf code, for
>things which not everyone uses, but someone did.
>
>It would be really nice if the most serious pf users out there would
>download -current snapshots, install them, and try to use the regular
>and obscure new features.  If you find bugs now, we can fix the before
>3.3 ships.  If you find them once 3.3 is running, you'll be annoyed.
>
>So help us out, ok?