Re: string cleanup results

["Kevin A. Sindhu" <Kevin.A.Sindhu@Mail.AC>]

> begin  electrogrammati illius Andrew Pinski
> 
> >On Saturday, Apr 19, 2003, at 15:54 US/Eastern, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >
> >> The remaining ones are very difficult.  afs, gcc, binutils, etc.
> >
> >I can do gcc and submit it back to the fsf for 3.4 if need be.
> 
> You're joking. The OpenBSD group will keep using gcc 2.95.3 for 
> anothercouple of years, unless TenDRA or tcc make it into the tree 
> (which I
> highly doubt).

That was because of speed related issues with gcc 3.x right?