[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: aac patch
- To: misc@openbsd.org
- Subject: Re: aac patch
- From: Marco Peereboom <slash@peereboom.us>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 18:38:03 -0500
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Organization: Peereboom dot US
- References: <71A8881A-DB6A-11D7-9667-000393D46686@magerealm.com> <20030901080456.GA24000@folly> <200309011150.33281.slash@peereboom.us>
- User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2
No. The patch mentioned was against 1.14. I just went through cvs and I saw
that this particular patch did not make it in -current. 1.15 is just some
string cleanup.
So aac is still broken in -current.
>
> On Monday 01 September 2003 03:04 am, Markus Friedl wrote:
> > does sys/dev/ic/aac.c revision 1.14 fix your problem?
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 09:20:25PM -0700, Chris Giard wrote:
> > > Is there any chance this patch (or a similar one) will be included in
> > > 3.4? I realize it is rather late, but this patch has been waiting
> > > since ~3.2.
> > >
> > > http://www.sigmasoft.com/~openbsd/archive/openbsd-tech/200210/
> > > msg00027.html
> > >
> > > -Chris
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 08:59:58AM +0000, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > > I have used the patch mentioned in:
> > > http://www.netsys.com/openbsd-misc/2002/11/msg01105.html
> > > Since 3.2 on several production boxes without problems.
> > >
> > > On Sunday 31 August 2003 04:20, Chris Giard wrote:
> > > > Is there any chance this patch (or a similar one) will be included in
> > > > 3.4? I realize it is rather late, but this patch has been waiting
> > > > since ~3.2.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.sigmasoft.com/~openbsd/archive/openbsd-tech/200210/
> > > > msg00027.html
> > > >
> > > > -Chris