Re: 3.4 CDs

["Tony Campisi" <tony.campisi@superiorenergy.com>]

>I personally don't find it directly inconvenient at all. Do others? I
didn't think of that when I brought the point up.
>I do see the 6-monthly release cycle as something that damages the
quality of the releases, and of the OS as a whole.
>And that I do find inconvenient.
>-- 
>Peter Fairbrother

http://www.openbsd.org/testimonials.html

[quote]Security Engineer Tyler Allison writes:
I have installed, secured, and maintained Linux, Windows NT and OpenBSD
in highly secure environments. (yes you can secure Linux and Windows NT
in this environment :) ). Having said that I have to point out that if
you want a minimum administration to keep up with security issues option
you need to pick OpenBSD by far. It is not uncommon for people to go
years without updating their production OpenBSD machines because they
are just rock solid and there are no known "remote" vulnerabilities.
Thus no good reason to upgrade...[/quote]


Maybe yall can have a mind-meld or something? 

T-Shirt Idea:  Politics, Religion and OpenBSD. Arguments just waiting to
happen.