[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: using 'n'at instead of 'p'at on OpenBSD 3.3

To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: using 'n'at instead of 'p'at on OpenBSD 3.3
From: Henning Brauer <lists-openbsd@bsws.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 21:14:44 -0600
Content-Disposition: inline
Mail-Followup-To: misc@openbsd.org
References: <B64A8834-ED6F-11D7-A6DD-000393D15BEE@web.de>

On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:43:28AM +0200, Sebastian Schinzel wrote:
> is there a way to tell pf to use nat instead of pat and to leave the 
> source port of  the packets untouched?

look for the static-port option, as usual covered by our fine 
pf.conf(5) manpage.

-- 
http://2suck.net/hhwl.html - http://www.bsws.de/
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)

References:
- using 'n'at instead of 'p'at on OpenBSD 3.3
  - From: Sebastian Schinzel <soidberg@web.de>

Prev by Date: -current pf syntax question
Next by Date: Re: PF and MAC adress
Prev by thread: using 'n'at instead of 'p'at on OpenBSD 3.3
Next by thread: -current pf syntax question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread