Re: OpenBSD and FS-Support (compiling kernel without support..)

[Thorsten Glaser <tg-v2003@netcologne.de>]

Dixitur illum chuck+obsd@2003.snew.com scribere...

>I've never been really clear why non-native file system support
>isn't done via a kernel module.

Because this is not the (Open)BSD philosophy.
We don't need to modularize the kernel. It's good as it is.

//Thorsten
-- 
[...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but
what about xfs, and if only i had waited until reiser4 was ready... in the be-
ginning, there was ffs, and in the middle, there was ffs, and at the end, there
was still ffs, and the sys admins knew it was good. :)	-- Ted Unangst über *fs