[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Something for 3.5 (2)?

To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Something for 3.5 (2)?
From: Jared Yanovich <jjy2+@pitt.edu>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 17:13:58 -0500
References: <000501c3a111$6d6cf900$fa163dcb@foo> <003901c3a123$41a84560$0200a8c0@53fcc14d> <3FA4D60A.5070000@lycos.com> <003501c3a225$a48bf070$0200a8c0@53fcc14d> <3FA689E8.4050006@lycos.com> <005601c3a242$d3df3db0$0200a8c0@53fcc14d>

> What's about bzip2 for better compression of the source/binaries?

Read the archives. On older machines, bzip2 is unacceptably CPU-
intensive.

	- Jared

References:
- Afterstep: core dump after core dump...
  - From: "jamesb.au@acm.org" <jamesb.au@ozemail.com.au>
- Something for 3.5 ?
  - From: "Mark" <judas_iskario@web.de>
- Re: Something for 3.5 ?
  - From: Julien TOUCHE <julien.touche@lycos.com>
- Something for 3.5 (2)?
  - From: "Mark" <judas_iskario@web.de>

Prev by Date: newsyslog and pflog
Next by Date: Is there a limit to number of members in a group?
Prev by thread: Something for 3.5 (2)?
Next by thread: Error in patch 004's instruction
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread