[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PF (CBQ) restriction ?

To: Henning Brauer <lists-openbsd@bsws.de>
Subject: Re: PF (CBQ) restriction ?
From: "evgeniy@riscom.net" <evgeniy@riscom.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:11:48 +0200
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
References: <402B313C.8000405@riscom.net> <20040212111107.GD8595@skywalker.bsws.de> <200402121111.54114.hsiaolungchang@cksf.org> <20040212182234.GN8595@skywalker.bsws.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Henning Brauer wrote:

>* Hsiao-lung Chang <hsiaolungchang@cksf.org> [2004-02-12 17:16]:
>  
>
>>The Cisco router I got default to 50 queues.
>>I think if you ever get your queue to fill up that high, you don't have enough 
>>CPU to process the packets quick enough.
>>    
>>
>
>ehhh, wait. highend cisco routers have the cpu power of about the older 
>soekris. this' not cisco...
>  
>
At us the common traffic will not exceed 10 megabits, really the 
powerful machine i386 can not consult(cope) with this ?
The problem, queue will be about(near) 2000 - 6000.

References:
- PF (CBQ) restriction ?
  - From: "evgeniy@riscom.net" <evgeniy@riscom.net>
- Re: PF (CBQ) restriction ?
  - From: Henning Brauer <lists-openbsd@bsws.de>
- Re: PF (CBQ) restriction ?
  - From: Hsiao-lung Chang <hsiaolungchang@cksf.org>
- Re: PF (CBQ) restriction ?
  - From: Henning Brauer <lists-openbsd@bsws.de>

Prev by Date: Re: PF-NAT and RFC 1878
Next by Date: FTP dies durring connection when redirected through firewall
Prev by thread: Re: PF (CBQ) restriction ?
Next by thread: Re: PF (CBQ) restriction ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread