Re: PF-NAT and RFC 1878

[Tim Kornau <opti@openbsd.de>]

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 at 10:07 -0700, Pillai, Gopakumar (Gopu) wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using NAT of PF on OpenBSD 3.2 stable. I have a static nat rule to
> translate 192.168.1.0/28. Problem here is that the first subnet
> 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.14 is not translated, rest all works fine.
>
> So my question is that, does PF support 1 subnet bit (as mentioned in
> RFC 1878). If not in 3.2 did they change the behavior in later versions?

I have 10.0.0.0/30 and translation works fine could you post you nat
rule ?

Tim



--
Darksun rising over blood red sea

[demime 0.98d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]