[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: slow ethernet
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:34:15 +0100
firstname.lastname@example.org (Henning Brauer) wrote:
> * Steven S. <email@example.com> [2004-02-16 09:18]:
> > In my opinion if you've never experienced problems with auto negotiation
> > your either very lucky or not looking for it.
> no, you are probably doing something else very wrong and autoneg
> failing is an effect, not a cause.
> yet, the "autoneg is problematic" myth keeps spreading, yet it is utter
> i don't have a single box with autoneg problems here, and that is all
> kind of architectures with a _lot_ of different NICs to several
> different cisco switches.
Autoneg isn't an option it's a must for a NIC.
Where is the problem to write 2 shellscripts?!
You told us you've an autoneg-problem?
I think the rom on your NIC is damaged so wrote 2 shellscripts.
One to set up 100MBit and one for 10MBit.... is it so difficoult?
'ifconfig' is your friend...
[demime 0.98d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]