[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: xfree86 license

To: Christopher Hylarides <hylaride@capybara.org>
Subject: Re: xfree86 license
From: Brett Lymn <blymn@baesystems.com.au>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 11:40:45 +1030
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200402170505.i1H55T1W006561@caligula.anu.edu.au> <40324250.7000504@capybara.org> <20040218012103.GB24672@baea.com.au> <4032D5EB.5040308@capybara.org> <20040218033027.GC24672@baea.com.au> <40339295.3020304@capybara.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:28:05AM -0500, Christopher Hylarides wrote:
> <http://www.netbsd.org/Misc/about.html>
> 
> >
> >in the first paragraph.
> > 
> >
> So?  Look on all of the openbsd platform pages.  They all say they've 
> taken code from free/netbsd.
> 

So.  We get back to the original point.  How is that license
materially different to the XFree86 one?  Why is compliance with the
free/netbsd license conditions different to the same for xfree?  This
is what was originally asked and has not been adequately (or even
attempted to be) answered.

-- 
Brett Lymn

Follow-Ups:
- Re: xfree86 license
  - From: Jacob Meuser <jakemsr@jakemsr.com>

References:
- Re: xfree86 license
  - From: Darren Reed <avalon@caligula.anu.edu.au>
- Re: xfree86 license
  - From: Christopher Hylarides <hylaride@capybara.org>
- Re: xfree86 license
  - From: Brett Lymn <blymn@baesystems.com.au>
- Re: xfree86 license
  - From: Christopher Hylarides <hylaride@capybara.org>
- Re: xfree86 license
  - From: Brett Lymn <blymn@baesystems.com.au>
- Re: xfree86 license
  - From: Christopher Hylarides <hylaride@capybara.org>

Prev by Date: Re: mysql 4.0.18 and openssl (obsd 3.3)
Next by Date: Re: SGI's XFS filesystem
Prev by thread: Re: xfree86 license
Next by thread: Re: xfree86 license
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread