[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CUPS
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 08:54:11PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Javier Solorzano wrote:
>
> > Anyone knows the reason why openbsd is so Cups negative?
>
> The last time I read about CUPS it was full of buffer overflow bugs.
> Also, it is under the GPL.
Well, that was a while ago. A lot of those have been fixed. However,
there are still a lot of sprintf()s in the code (even though there's a
snprintf() implementation in the CUPS sources if the host OS doesn't
have snprintf()), and apparently some incorrect uses of sizeof().
What I don't get is that CUPS is the default print system for a lot of
OSes, but apparently none of them care to make CUPS more secure.
--
<jakemsr@jakemsr.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CUPS
- From: Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh@vsnl.com>
- Re: CUPS
- From: Marc Espie <espie@nerim.net>
- References:
- CUPS
- From: Javier Solorzano <jsolorz@mac.com>
- Re: CUPS
- From: Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh@vsnl.com>