Re: ISDN-Question

[Rembrandt <rembrandt@jpberlin.de>]

On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 20:00:43 -0700
deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org (Theo de Raadt) wrote:

> > Today I talked with an developer of MirBSD and he told me that MirBSD send
> > a patch/port for ISDN to OpenBSD but it wasn't included.
> 
> We were not interested in the tree damage.  ISDN is not important for
> how much splatter it does to the source tree.
> 
> > So could somebody told me WHY oBSD reject this patch/port for ISDN?!
> 
> Because we did not want it.
> 
> > And please come down guys: Don't make a flamewar..
> 
> Hey, don't you try to make it into a flamewar..
> 
> > I'm just interested why this patch never included into openBSD and why
> > openBSD can't handle ISDN. I think ISDN was included into 2.6 (or?) so why
> > isn't it in 3.4?
> 
> Because we did not want it.
> 
> > I know that this topic is a littlebit difficuolt but I only wanna know the
> > technical answer why ISDN isn't a part of oBSD and NO personal stuff like
> > (MirBSD isn't/is blbla". :) 
> 
> Because we did not want ISDN in the source tree, because it splattered
> stuff all over the place, and just really was not that pretty.

Ok thanks Theo :)

And the owner of getbsd@dslextreme.com (aka Greg Thomas):
Please write some other stuff to me... 
PISS OFF REMBRANDT isn't very well.. or?
I just exspected an answer such as the answer of Theo (thanks again).

[demime 0.98d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]