[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: openntpd and ntpq
- To: Darren Reed <avalon@cairo.anu.edu.au>
- Subject: Re: openntpd and ntpq
- From: Damien Miller <djm@mindrot.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 16:41:18 +1000
- Cc: misc@openbsd.org
- References: <200409020623.i826NKTu011910@cairo.anu.edu.au>
- ReSent-Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 19:26:28 +1000 (EST)
- Resent-From: Damien Miller <djm@mindrot.org>
- ReSent-Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.58.0409021926280.28185@shitei.mindrot.org>
- ReSent-Subject: Re: openntpd and ntpq
- Resent-To: misc@openbsd.org
- User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040827)
Darren Reed wrote:
> In some mail from Damien Miller, sie said:
>>I'd say that ntpd and bgpd are exemplars of this - I was able to
>>pick up bgpd and start making useful contributions after a couple of
>>hours reading it. Browsing the ntpd code, it seems similarly clear.
>
> It shouldn't have taken a couple of hours of reading bgpd to start making
> useful contributions, ideally it should have only taken minutes...
This time frame suggests that you are either:
1) superhuman;
2) disinclined to attempt to understand the code that you
"contributing" to; or
3) trolling
> I'd say more about the problems *I* see in the coding style, but clearly
> the people who are responsible for it think it is without fault and are
> not open to alternative views so I'd be wasting my time & effort.
If you offered patches instead of opinions, then they may be better
received.
-d