[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: setting runlevel to single-user
- To: misc@openbsd.org
- Subject: Re: setting runlevel to single-user
- From: Atle Kristensen <afk0@bluezone.no>
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 16:55:52 +0100
- References: <200410270433.i9R4X0QA013069@openbsd.cs.colorado.edu> <417F2ADD.7000508@unet.net.ph> <20041027171139.GA9572@termcap.net> <20041028011549.GA17803@baea.com.au> <20041028045101.GD9572@termcap.net> <20041028093709.GW10436@skywalker.bsws.de> <20041031004905.199b1f94.afk0@bluezone.no> <20041031105846.GM23863@skywalker.bsws.de>
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 11:58:46 +0100
Henning Brauer <lists-openbsd@bsws.de> wrote:
> * Atle Kristensen <afk0@bluezone.no> [2004-10-31 10:47]:
> > On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:37:09 +0200
> > Henning Brauer <lists-openbsd@bsws.de> wrote:
> > > on the other hand, I see that some things in our rc system are horribly
> > > inconsistent and ... lets call it improveable.
> > > It doesn't make sense to me that we have a rc.local by default (why?)
> > > and no rc.conf.local. IMHO we should have neither in a default install.
> > [snip-away-too-much]
> >
> > If someones cares - I like rc.local myself. I usually add stuff such as mysql/symon/++, and
> > specific stuff to my laptop (audioctl).
>
> ah, let me be clear on that. rc should still call rc.local if it
> exists. there just shouldn't be one by default. second best option
> would be having a default rc.conf.local as well; this inconsistency
> just does not make sense.
>
Thanks for clarifying.
(Sorry for last email of the wrong CC/To-header.)
--
Atle Kristensen - OpenBSD 3.4-beta GENERIC#135 i386
http://cacc.drmowinckel.com/ - Sign Against CopyProcteced CD
http://petition.eurolinux.org - Defend Software Patents in EU
http://www.petitiononline.com/xanthan/petition.html
- Petion For Intel Centrino under Linux/FreeBSD/NetBSD/OpenBSD.