Re: Again?: Mouse in console

[Theo de Raadt <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org>]

Blah blah blah blah blah

Will you please shut up with your continual whining?

We know you'll never do anything, so just shut up!

> Someone wrote:
> > Feel free to write a book, there are already a number out there - both
> > free and for money. 
> 
> You know, maybe I will.
> I always considered it hard to write a book.
> Especially if you've never done it before as you don't know 
> about publishers and all that stuff.
> But guess what, maybe I will. Because it still is easier to write
> a book about OpenBSD than to contribute to its scattered, 
> out-of-date, incomplete and only-for-devs-to-(never)-work-on "FAQ".
> 
> Guess why there are a number of books out there about
> OpenBSD, but OpenBSD *STILL* does not have a worthy
> FAQ / documentation after 10 years of existence???
> 
> I wonder why? Could it be because devs who don't care about
> it demand that only they themselves write it or noone?
> I guess so.
> I offered Nick Holland to send him a correction for the badly out
> of alphabetical order packages list for 3.5 i386 (which isn't even
> part of the FAQ).
> His answer: More or less: No interest.
> So why should I try to invest my time into something even bigger,
> if even small contributions are not accepted if you're not a team
> member? Sorry. No will do.
> Maybe I like starting with small things first.
> And that's why the "FAQ" is in exactly the state it is in now.
> If you think the "FAQ" is just fine the way it is I'm surprised you're
> not using windows. After all, windows is also just "fine the way
> it is", isn't it?
> I wonder who should go back to windows here. Someone who
> cares about quality AND documentation or someone who can't 
> keep a shoenail from a banana appart.
> 
> Most of you guys who answered me here are just a bunch of
> empty noses-in-the-wind who never contributed anything 
> themselves. That's the only explanation I have for your lack of 
> care about quality documentation.
> 
> Further replies will probably be ignored, I'm getting
> tired of all your repeats and ignorance of facts.
> 
> Greetings,
> Mark