[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bsd license question
- To: eric <eric-list-openbsd-misc@catastrophe.net>
- Subject: Re: bsd license question
- From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@webweaving.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 00:47:37 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: misc@openbsd.org
- References: <421F5828.6050203@bartula.de> <200502251706.j1PH6Nxk012232@cvs.openbsd.org> <20050227225159.GA1583@kingcull.cullmail.com> <6bfae015d6be3a51af8eaadd76a6ae1b@trumpetpower.com> <20050228010913.F30952@skutsje.san.webweaving.org> <94078ef7c7f6dec4efd4e939bdf705fb@trumpetpower.com> <20050228083146.H44451@skutsje.san.webweaving.org> <20050301000549.GQ13941@catastrophe.net>
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, eric wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 08:43:43 -0800, Dirk-Willem van Gulik proclaimed...
>
> > Not sure if calling folks a liar is going to help :-) -- but I assume
> > there was a smiley missing. Plus I am fairly sure that the new ASF license
> > is rather a lot longer than the old one :-).
>
> Doesn't this stuff belong on openbsd-advocacy@
>
> I'm not trolling; just trying to point out that there's a forum for this
> verbosity that might be more suited.
As an outside who is trying to gather constructive feedback on the new ASF
license - I'd be happy to follow any change to a more appropriate forum.
DW.