[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GNOME port

To: Brad <brad@comstyle.com>
Subject: Re: GNOME port
From: David Lebel <lebel@lebel.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 08:47:34 -0400
Cc: Erik Verbruggen <ejv@cs.kun.nl>, ports@openbsd.org
Content-Disposition: inline
Organization: None whatsover.
References: <20010529121939.A2300@road-warrior.cs.kun.nl> <Pine.BSO.4.33.0105290744120.20223-100000@ss5.comstyle.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

Quoting Brad (brad@comstyle.com):
> Which is *really* annoying considering every 3rd party program Ive seen
> that uses libxml (so far) uses libxml 2.x and only GNOME still bothers to
> use the inferior 1.x.

I'm quite sure both xml 1.x can live with 2.x quite happilly.  I've been
running a local port of libxml-1.8.5 here with libxml-2.3.6 without any
problems.  All the files don't share the same namespace.

[0]$ pkg_info | grep xml
libxml-2.3.6       XML parsing library
libxml1-1.8.13     xml parser library for GNOME

Ciao,
  ...David

-- 
// david lebel <lebel@{lebel.org,nobiaze.com,openbsd.org}> //
// http://www.lebel.org/           http://www.nobiaze.com/ //
// pgp: 3633 6999 D47E 73ED 099F  4341 08A4 8E48 EF56 61D1 //

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GNOME port
  - From: Brad <brad@comstyle.com>

References:
- GNOME port
  - From: Erik Verbruggen <ejv@cs.kun.nl>
- Re: GNOME port
  - From: Brad <brad@comstyle.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Abiword problem
Next by Date: Re: Plugin versioning?
Prev by thread: Re: GNOME port
Next by thread: Re: GNOME port
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread