[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: port of cdrtools

To: ports@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: port of cdrtools
From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 22:47:26 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups: list.openbsd.ports
References: <a8km5n$2kar$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> <Pine.BSO.4.44.0204240436120.3939-100000@norm.encryptedemail.net> <aa7j6l$1voi$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> <20020425030211.GA21154@builder.gsky.dom>

Jacob Meuser <jakemsr@jakemsr.com> wrote:

> http://www.jakemsr.com/openbsd/ports/cdrtools-1.10-port.tgz

By and large I like this.
What's the reason for excluding isodump?

I haven't made up my mind about the packaging yet.  Do we need that
"cdrtools-" prefix?  In fact, now that mkisofs has been renamed,
is there a point in splitting this up in multiple packages?

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de

Follow-Ups:
- Re: port of cdrtools
  - From: Jacob Meuser <jakemsr@jakemsr.com>

References:
- Re: port of cdrtools
  - From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)
- Re: port of cdrtools
  - From: Jolan Luff <jolan@encryptedemail.net>
- Re: port of cdrtools
  - From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)
- Re: port of cdrtools
  - From: Jacob Meuser <jakemsr@jakemsr.com>

Prev by Date: bonobo port -- is this right?
Next by Date: Re: port of cdrtools
Prev by thread: Re: port of cdrtools
Next by thread: Re: port of cdrtools
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread