[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Setiqueue port

To: ports@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Setiqueue port
From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:45:37 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups: list.openbsd.ports
References: <000301c2cbf9$801573e0$b80e0798@flynn>

Philihp Busby <philihp@philihp.com> wrote:

> Is there a unix alternative to Setiqueue?

I'm not aware of one.

I use the {Fetch,Run}Cache scripts that are referenced on the
SETI@home add-ons page, but these are crude and don't scale since
they maintain a separate cache on each client host.

> Or a way to run it on OpenBSD without Wine?

Does our Wine port even work?

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Setiqueue port
  - From: "Todd T. Fries" <todd@openbsd.org>
- Re: Setiqueue port
  - From: Lars Hansson <lars@unet.net.ph>

References:
- Setiqueue port
  - From: "Philihp Busby" <philihp@philihp.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Where's the right place to document sysctl's for ogle?
Next by Date: Can't install any more ports
Prev by thread: Setiqueue port
Next by thread: Re: Setiqueue port
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread