[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: proposed patch to porttest.html

To: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
Subject: Re: proposed patch to porttest.html
From: Marc Espie <espie@nerim.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 01:56:51 +0100
Cc: ports@openbsd.org
Content-Disposition: inline
Mail-Followup-To: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>,ports@openbsd.org
References: <Pine.BSO.4.51.0302041206310.2651@naughty.monkey.org> <b1s76t$nse$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:37:01PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Jose Nazario <jose@monkey.org> wrote:
> 
> > +    <p>Dependency handling is easily verified by removing the stated
> > +    dependencies and ensuring the port insists they be installed before
> > +    the appropriate stage is attempted.</p>
> 
> I don't understand this.

Not only that, but this is completely wrong. Dependency checking does not
work that way, unfortunately.

References:
- proposed patch to porttest.html
  - From: Jose Nazario <jose@monkey.org>
- Re: proposed patch to porttest.html
  - From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)

Prev by Date: Re: proposed patch to porttest.html
Next by Date: update: cdrtools-2.0
Prev by thread: Re: proposed patch to porttest.html
Next by thread: Where's the right place to document sysctl's for ogle?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread