[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: x11/rxvt suggestion
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 05:33:09PM -0400, Brian wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 04:25:19PM -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> > Frankly, I believe that rxvt port and rclock port should be compiled
> > from the same source version. They are developed together. But in our
> > ports tree:
> > $ pkg_info | grep "rxvt\|rclock"
> > rxvt-2.6.4 color, low memory usage, xterm replacement
> > rclock-2.7.6 analog clock for X11 w/appoint. reminder and mail notif
> yes, but they are two TOTALLY different and unrelated applications. They
> should be separate ports.
I didn't mention anything about merging them. In fact I like them being
separate ports. What I'm talking about is that they should be compiled
from the same source base. That is currently rxvt-2.7.10.tar.gz
available from rxvt.org. That version contains important security fixes
and that should be incorporated in our rxvt port, IMHO.
Zvezdan Petkovic <email@example.com>