[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No more ports of unfree software
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 08:41:47PM -0400, email@example.com wrote:
> As far as the "not officially from OpenBSD", I don't think that argument
> would hold any water, because the Makefile and any patches would
> obviously be open for anyone to read, and one could even download the
> source from the official site and run md5 themselves if they dont trust
> it. I think after a while, people will see that this repository can be
> trusted and will use it as an alternative if they wish...
Well, Darren Reed released OpenBSD+ipf and misc@ got some mailings about
requests for help with it. Unofficial stuff that clouds what OpenBSD
really is causes annoyance.
I can only see the same thing happening with an unoffical ports tree.
Even when displaying warnings at every turn, e-mail to ports@ will
undoubtedly turn up.
/usr/ports/mystuff is there for people to use. Throw your favorite
unofficial / unfree / removed ports there.