Re: Update: pwm

[Greg Steuck <greg-openbsd-ports@nest.cx>]

>>>>> "Christian" == Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> writes:

    Christian> While I generally do encourage people to double-check
    Christian> whether any gmake dependency is really required and to
    Christian> patch out minor gmake-isms, I'm not in favor of
    Christian> completely rewriting Makefiles to this purpose.  It does
    Christian> not enhance the maintainability of a port.

I believe in case of pwm there was another reason to rewrite the build
system. Namely, it uses a unique configuration system and it is easier
to replace such build system with a completely new one.