Re: devel/jdk status?

[Niklas Hallqvist <niklas@copper.appli.se>]

Thanks, I was just about to deal with this, after having fallen off
the earth a while the last few weeks.  I am very sorry for not
following this through.  Will now go on to deal with native jdk 1.3.1
for ELF, should be a breeze.

Niklas

> From truk@optonline.net  Wed Jun 25 06:58:43 2003
> Return-Path: <truk@optonline.net>
> Received: from Truk.zonesville.com (ool-182e24b7.dyn.optonline.net [24.46.36.183])
> 	by ritz.appli.se (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h5P4wgga003816
> 	for <niklas@copper.appli.se>; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 06:58:43 +0200 (CEST)
> Received: from Truk ([127.0.0.1]) by Truk.zonesville.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
> 	 Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:58:03 -0400
> Message-ID: <006801c33ad6$5bbcd460$200110ac@zonesville.com>
> From: "Kurt Miller" <truk@optonline.net>
> To: "Niklas Hallqvist" <niklas@copper.appli.se>,
>    "Christian Gruber" <cgruber@israfil.net>
> Cc: "'Alexander Hall'" <alexander@beard.se>, <ports@openbsd.org>
> References: <200306021321.h52DLj0m012568@copper.appli.se> <006901c32985$77c9aa00$200110ac@zonesville.com>
> Subject: Re: devel/jdk status?
> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:58:01 -0400
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> 	charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jun 2003 04:58:03.0312 (UTC) FILETIME=[5BBE5B00:01C33AD6]
> X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.1(snapshot 20020920) (ritz)
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0
> 	tests=MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES
> 	version=2.55
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
> 
> From: "Kurt Miller" <truk@optonline.net>
> > From: "Niklas Hallqvist" <niklas@copper.appli.se>
> > > What needs to be done is very likely to fix the brk(2) syscall to
> > > return the actual break-value coming from userland in all cases.
> > snip
> > > Good start for a kernel hacker wannabe.  Send me your proposed fix and
> > > I'll review and test it for free ;-)
> >
> > Oh yea, it fixes devel/jdk/1.3-linux with the 8.0 redhat libs as you
> > suspected. :-)
> >
> 
> For those who are interested... A style(9) cleaned up version of the patch I
> posted was commited a few days ago by tedu@. The most recent snapshot (June
> 23rd) now works with devel/jdk/1.3-linux and the 8.0 redhat libs.
> 
> Now if 1.2 native was working jdk/* would be in good shape.
> 
> -Kurt
>