[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: pkg_info and $PKG_PATH

To: Ben Goren <ben@trumpetpower.com>
Subject: Re: pkg_info and $PKG_PATH
From: Peter Valchev <pvalchev@sightly.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 01:30:10 -0600
Cc: ports@openbsd.org
Content-Disposition: inline
Mail-Followup-To: Ben Goren <ben@trumpetpower.com>, ports@openbsd.org
References: <20030816041140.GC11368@trumpetpower.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

> I'm guessing that pkg_info should ignore $PKG_PATH.This is all on
...
Why?  I don't see why it should act different than pkg_add, etc., so I
think the current behaviour is good, unless I am misunderstanding
something here

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pkg_info and $PKG_PATH
  - From: Ben Goren <ben@trumpetpower.com>

References:
- pkg_info and $PKG_PATH
  - From: Ben Goren <ben@trumpetpower.com>

Prev by Date: pkg_info and $PKG_PATH
Next by Date: Re: Update textproc/libxml to 2.5.9
Prev by thread: pkg_info and $PKG_PATH
Next by thread: Re: pkg_info and $PKG_PATH
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread