[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: x11/fluxbox (was: Re: soft lock in progress)

To: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
Subject: Re: x11/fluxbox (was: Re: soft lock in progress)
From: e <eliab@spack.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 16:18:20 -0700
Cc: ports@openbsd.org
Content-Disposition: inline
Mail-Followup-To: e <eliab@spack.org>,Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>, ports@openbsd.org
References: <20030823231531.GA19010@beryl.sightly.net> <20030823234110.GI28021@boetes.org> <biagm0$1ons$2@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

* naddy (naddy@mips.inka.de) wrote:
>Han Boetes <han@mijncomputer.nl> wrote:
>
>> Could you be so kind to revert fluxbox to the latest 0.1.14 version. I consider
>> that one much more stable than the current 0.9.3 release. I though at the time
>> I commited it the new 1.0 would be working and stable. I was wrong.
>
>A bit unusual that, after two months.  Anybody want to offer second
>opinions?

well it core dumps on my -current box, didn't bother to figure out why.

>
>-- 
>Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de

-- 
eliab[at]spack[dot]org
populus  vult  decipi

References:
- soft lock in progress
  - From: Peter Valchev <pvalchev@openbsd.org>
- Re: soft lock in progress
  - From: Han Boetes <han@mijncomputer.nl>
- x11/fluxbox (was: Re: soft lock in progress)
  - From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)

Prev by Date: Re: Patch to update Lua to version 5.0
Next by Date: UPDATE: mplayer
Prev by thread: Re: x11/fluxbox (was: Re: soft lock in progress)
Next by thread: Re: soft lock in progress
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread