MirPorts and contributors' names (was Re: Thorsten Glaser)

[Thorsten Glaser <tg-i2004@netcologne.de>]

Dixitur illum espie@nerim.net scribere...

>Removing the maintainer information is just the polite thing to do.

This has already been done yesterday. All your actions are so pathetic.
Some people even get annoyed about an _unmodified_ copy of the OpenBSD
ports tree I keep in a CVS vendor branch. But if you were to check the
latest source, you'd see no maintainers.

I think, it's you who should go a step back. You are always offending,
blocking etc. - but on the other hand, you're telling people "if you
don't like it, go away or fork and do it yourself".

You could have asked or hinted me privately, instead of writing a
follow-up on deadly.org which I do not check daily, and shortly after
that threatening me through email.
I won't be more cooperative than you. But then, I will accept to
back out from posting here or on deadly.org, because it's not bringing
you forward - and neither, me.

Oh, another thing: the ${MAINTAINER} variable has a different meaning
now, as can be seen best in net/p5-Socket6.
I will regenerate the INDEX, so you can see no other persons' names
are left. (It should appear on anoncvs in about... 18-20 hours)

//Thorsten

PS: It's not nice to put persons' names into the Subject.
-- 
Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich*
schmutzige Tricks, wie bei einer doppelt verketteten Liste beide
Pointer XORen und in nur einem Word speichern, funktioniert Boehm ganz
hervorragend.		-- Andreas Bogk über boehm-gc in d.a.s.r