[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is there a good reason qmail isn't a port?

To: nemir nemiria <nemir@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Is there a good reason qmail isn't a port?
From: Andreas Kahari <ak+openbsd@freeshell.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:43:37 +0100
Cc: ports@openbsd.org
Content-Disposition: inline
Mail-Followup-To: nemir nemiria <nemir@hotmail.com>,ports@openbsd.org
References: <BAY16-F27zPkLbg7SqC00034088@hotmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

Read the "Another discussion on included things in OpenBSD"
discussion from last week.


    http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=108811318600001&r=1&w=2


Andreas

On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:47:00PM +0000, nemir nemiria wrote:
> Just curious.   It seems that they have synergistic philosophy and it's 
> popular and stable.
> 
> Chau,
> 
> Nemir
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Protect your inbox from harmful viruses with new ninemsn Premium. Go to   
> http://ninemsn.com.au/premium/landing.asp?banner=emailtag&referrer=hotmail

-- 
Andreas Kähäri

References:
- Is there a good reason qmail isn't a port?
  - From: "nemir nemiria" <nemir@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Is there a good reason qmail isn't a port?
Next by Date: Re: Is there a good reason qmail isn't a port?
Prev by thread: Is there a good reason qmail isn't a port?
Next by thread: Re: Is there a good reason qmail isn't a port?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread