[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is there a good reason qmail isn't a port?

To: nemir nemiria <nemir@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Is there a good reason qmail isn't a port?
From: Tim Donahue <tdonahue@haynes-group.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 10:47:36 -0400
Cc: ports@openbsd.org
Organization: Haynes Group Incorporated
References: <BAY16-F27zPkLbg7SqC00034088@hotmail.com>

At one point it was in the ports tree, see
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/mail/qmail/files/Attic/md5
for the reason why it was removed.

Tim Donahue


On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 09:47, nemir nemiria wrote:
> Just curious.   It seems that they have synergistic philosophy and it's 
> popular and stable.
> 
> Chau,
> 
> Nemir
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Protect your inbox from harmful viruses with new ninemsn Premium. Go to   
> http://ninemsn.com.au/premium/landing.asp?banner=emailtag&referrer=hotmail
>

References:
- Is there a good reason qmail isn't a port?
  - From: "nemir nemiria" <nemir@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Is there a good reason qmail isn't a port?
Next by Date: Re: Is there a good reason qmail isn't a port?
Prev by thread: Re: Is there a good reason qmail isn't a port?
Next by thread: Re: Is there a good reason qmail isn't a port?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread