Re: updated ion port

[Pedro Martelletto <pbastos@inf.puc-rio.br>]

although i've been eager to see an update in the port of this 'obscure
window manager', i'm afraid naddy is right. going for the stable version
is the best choice.

-p.

On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 08:59:10PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Tim Kornau <opti@openbsd.de> wrote:
> 
> > bernd@bsws.de and me did an update of the ion port to ion2/stable and
> > ion3/snapshot.
> 
> Sigh.  Do we really need to split an obscure window manager into
> stable and snapshot ports?
> 
> There are probably stable and development branches for most maintained
> pieces of software.  That doesn't mean that we want to reflect this
> in ports.  General policy is to go with the stable version unless
> special circumstances suggest otherwise.
> 
> -- 
> Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de