Re: modules, PLIST and PFRAG.shared

[naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber)]

Jolan Luff <jolan@protection.cx> wrote:

> > So for ports that set NOT_FOR_ARCHS=NO_SHARED_ARCHS, should .so
> > files be put into PFRAG.shared, or should update-plist be patched
> > to not move .so files to PFRAG.shared?
> 
> Put them in PFRAG.shared regardless of NOT_FOR_ARCHS=NO_SHARED_ARCHS.

Assuming there *is* a PFRAG.shared.  If a port is only for shared
archs, there is no point in having PFRAG.shared in the first place.
Actual handling of this in the ports tree is inconsistent; I don't
think it's a terribly important detail.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de