[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: An experimental patching framework...
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, d neal wise wrote:
> hi adrian :)
Well, look who popped up! We should keep in touch more... :)
> feel free (anyone interested) to subscribe to this. we didn't make it
> public because we were just bouncing ideas around. It has somewhat
> disappeared but it just needs to be stirred :)
I'll do that, but for the moment I'll keep posting here too, since I'm
sure there are a bunch of people out there with great ideas.
> or having to put development tools or use awkward manual methods on
> firewalls to keep them patched
I tend to put everything on anyway, and keep it _all_ patched. In the
case of OpenBSD I think it's probably more work to leave things out... :)
> It would also be very cool to take release OpenBSD and bring it up to date
> quickly and easily with packages (or something) built on the release
> source plus the patch-branch contents. Ideally these would come from some
> verifiable trusted source. i'm getting waaay ahead of myself. i think
This is why I took the build from source approach, since anyone can easily
check that it's doing the right thing, and no-one has to rely on a binary
distribution from anywhere. If you want binaries, you can do that (or
someone else can do it for you), but it's not mandatory.
> I've been meaning to try some of the work that william and a few other
> people were doing but I got busy and on leave. If you're interested Adrian
> I can send you an archive of the emails sent through the little list we
I'd appreciate that. I started this from square 0 on Monday, with just my
own ideas and pre-conceptions. :)
Adrian Close email: adrian@fernhilltec.com.au
Internet Security Consultant mobile: +61 412 385 201
Fernhill Technology Pty. Ltd. phone: +61 3 9876 6844
1/3 Colman Rd. Warranwood, 3134, AU fax: +61 3 9876 6855