Re: updating remote 2.5 to current

["Samuel McCloud" <smccloud@tcainternet.com>]

> Obviously, Clifton is the kind of person who upgrades NT remotely.
Probably Linux too.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Theo de Raadt" <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org>
To: "Clifton Royston" <cliftonr@lava.net>
Cc: "David Uhring" <duhring@charter.net>; "Wozz"
<wozz+openbsd-tech@wookie.net>; "William Allen Simpson"
<wsimpson@greendragon.com>; <tech@openbsd.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 1999 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: updating remote 2.5 to current


> > > Like Theo told the guy, put NT on the machine, although this thread
> > > is starting to get a little humorous.  If he did install NT, maybe we
> > > wouldn't have to see this crap anymore.
> >
> >   It doesn't improve the image of UNIX, BSD, or OpenBSD specifically,
> > to hear the developers make implied claims that it's less stable or
> > reliable than Windows NT.
>
> Wow, you're a whiner too.  You don't belong here.
>
> For those who recall, Bill Simpson was told repeatedly that upgrading
> 2.5 to 2.6 at a remote location was probably not going to work.
>
> Then he started whining.
>
> Obviously, Clifton is the kind of person who upgrades NT remotely.
>
> Get over yourself, Clifton and Bill.
>
> This is free software.  Don't like it?  Send in fixes.  Bitches,
> whines, and mail like this normally go straight to /dev/null -- I'm
> being very nice to waste my time and reply.