[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OpenBSD/Errata/BUGTraq et al.
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: OpenBSD/Errata/BUGTraq et al.
- From: <amanda_(_at_)_wineasy_(_dot_)_se>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 17:32:39 +0200 (CEST)
There is no contradiction between remote upgrades and security. In fact,
you need easy upgrades in order to keep servers secure. I am here too
because I want top of the line security. A secure server should be located
in a secure place, and that is *not* in your bedroom (not in mine anyway).
Security is not just about source code audits, it's a whole lot bigger.
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, STeve Andre' wrote:
> You'd like poll data? Given the resources of the development team, I would
> rather they concentrate on the things which make the system secure,
> even if it means more problems in other areas.
> I think most of use would up using OpenBSD precisely because of it's
> security aspects, and however nice remote upgrades would be, I see
> things like that as less essential to the mission as security.
Visit your host, monkey.org