[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: centralized user management
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: centralized user management
- From: Chuck Yerkes <chuck+obsd_(_at_)_2003_(_dot_)_snew_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 12:45:47 -0400
- Mail-followup-to: Chuck Yerkes <chuck+obsd_(_at_)_2003_(_dot_)_snew_(_dot_)_com>, misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Reply-to: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
I've just invented NIS and gone back in time to 1987 or so
to plant the seeds for it. Ha, it's now mature. Not ideal
where security is a great concern, but good enough for home
and many LANs.
Quoting Matt Van Mater (nutter__(_at_)_hotmail_(_dot_)_com):
> I'm looking for a way to manage user accounts on my small home network, and
> would like to create a centralized method of authentication. I have looked
> into it and have yet to find a solution that meets my needs well. I am
> aware of openldap, but i think that implementing LDAP in my small network
> would be a huge overkill for syncing a few users/groups and things like
> that.
>
> One really easy way of doing it would be to set up an nfs mount and use the
> passwd file on a central computer, but this would be an extremely bad idea
> i'm sure.
>
> I looked into kerberos, but I admit I only have a cursory knowledge of how
> I can use it in an openbsd environment. I have read several tutorials
> linked off of deadly.org but they all address the need to kerberize daemons
> like telnet and ftp, and don't address my need for a simple logon.
>
> How would you guys suggest I set up a relatively secure, centralized
> authentication system for a network made up of mostly openbsd machines (I
> do have some freebsd, mandrake and win2k boxen, but i don't care about them
> using the same auth)
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
Visit your host, monkey.org