[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: handy script on FW
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: handy script on FW
- From: steve <steve_(_at_)_szmidt_(_dot_)_org>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 18:28:05 -0400
On Sunday 27 April 2003 17:20, Henning Brauer wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 01:22:43PM -0400, steve wrote:
> > (Though I stay away from the
> > ports as they don't receive the security audit OpenBSD gets.)
> this is a rather stupid statement. the ports do receive some
> auditing. not to the extend the stuff in base does, but still.
> and the option to write shellscripts instead or compile stuff
> from their source is... ahem.
: ) Yes, of course! Too many tree's to see the forest comes to mind.
My blaring shortcoming re hacking scripts aside, not having any
input to corrupt it seems pretty OK... No?
HTML in e-mail is not safe. It let's spammers know to spam you more,
and sets you up for online attack through IE 4.x and above.
Using HTML in e-mail only promotes it as safe to the uninitiated.
Visit your host, monkey.org