[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ifconfig: side effects of new lladdr feature
- To: misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
- Subject: Re: ifconfig: side effects of new lladdr feature
- From: Claudio Jeker <cjeker_(_at_)_diehard_(_dot_)_n-r-g_(_dot_)_com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:01:52 +0159
- Mail-followup-to: Claudio Jeker <cjeker_(_at_)_diehard_(_dot_)_n-r-g_(_dot_)_com>, misc_(_at_)_openbsd_(_dot_)_org
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 01:40:06AM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tested the new feature for changing the MAC address of an interface
> today. Most of the time it works with my CURRENT box, but sometimes
> there are problems. The problem is not changing the MAC address (this
> always works), but the network traffic after the change.
>
> (IP was not changed in the following example)
> example: #ifconfig fxp0 192.168.1.5 netmask 255.255.255.0 lladdr
> 11:11:11:11:11:11
>
This is a (broken) multicast ethernet address and so getting strange
results needs to be expected.
> #tcpdump -nevvvSi fxp0
> ...
> 00:55:20.285173 11:11:11:11:11:11 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 0806 42: arp who-has
> 192.168.1.5 tell 192.168.1.5
>
> After changing the MAC address, the interface always sends at least one
> ARP request for itself, but doesn't answer. Curiously, sometimes there
> are no problems with this, although there's never a visible reply to
> these ARP requests. I haven't found out the reason why new traffic after
> changing the MAC address sometimes works without problems and sometimes
> not yet.
>
> Sometimes (but not always) other hosts (OpenBSD 3.6 stable) begin to use
> a multicast ethernet address (i.e. 1:0:5e:28:1:5; which is the correct
> mapping to the IP 192.168.1.5) to send packets to the host which
> recently changed the MAC address (TCP traffic). The host doesn't respond
> to these packets. Perhaps this is related to setting the interface with
> the changed MAC to promiscous mode (no -p option for tcpdump; I always
> started tcpdump on the host with the changed MAC address):
>
> #tcpdump -nevvvSi fxp0
> ...
> 00:55:36.173196 0:60:8:69:8b:5d 1:0:5e:28:1:5 0800 78: 192.168.1.3.22 >
> 192.168.1.5.43577: S [tcp sum ok] 2739091304:2739091304(0) ack
> 3408283359 win 16384 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale
> 0,nop,nop,timestamp 318258886 1474066462> (ttl 61, id 486, len 64)
> 00:55:36.173276 0:40:63:c9:d8:6 1:0:5e:28:1:5 0800 78: 192.168.1.3.22 >
> 192.168.1.5.43577: S [tcp sum ok] 2739091304:2739091304(0) ack
> 3408283359 win 16384 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale
> 0,nop,nop,timestamp 318258886 1474066462> (ttl 60, id 486, len 64)
> 00:55:36.173399 0:60:8:69:8b:5d 1:0:5e:28:1:5 0800 78: 192.168.1.3.22 >
> 192.168.1.5.43577: S [tcp sum ok] 2739091304:2739091304(0) ack
> 3408283359 win 16384 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale
> 0,nop,nop,timestamp 318258886 1474066462> (ttl 59, id 486, len 64)
> 00:55:36.173459 0:40:63:c9:d8:6 1:0:5e:28:1:5 0800 78: 192.168.1.3.22 >
> 192.168.1.5.43577: S [tcp sum ok] 2739091304:2739091304(0) ack
> 3408283359 win 16384 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale
> 0,nop,nop,timestamp 318258886 1474066462> (ttl 58, id 486, len 64)
> 00:55:36.173590 0:60:8:69:8b:5d 1:0:5e:28:1:5 0800 78: 192.168.1.3.22 >
> 192.168.1.5.43577: S [tcp sum ok] 2739091304:2739091304(0) ack
> 3408283359 win 16384 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale
> 0,nop,nop,timestamp 318258886 1474066462> (ttl 57, id 486, len 64)
>
> Even more curiously, the MAC address of 192.168.1.3 ist 0:40:63:c9:d8:6,
> but 0:60:8:69:8b:5d is 192.168.1.6. So apparently tcpdump gives false
> output in this case.
>
> When the interface isn't set to promiscous mode, I didn't see other
> hosts addressing the box with a multicast ethernet address yet, and I
> didn't see false IP/MAC mappings, too. But sometimes the box seems to
> ignore all frames addressed to the new MAC, although it sends out
> packets with the new source MAC address (i.e. when I try to establish a
> new ssh session).
>
> I know this problem description is a little bit vague, but I've seen it
> several times now (and I've seen it working without problems several
> times, too). Can anybody reproduce these problems?
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
--
:wq Claudio
Visit your host, monkey.org